|
America's
Most Wanted
By:
Diane McGinn
Publication: Starburst 286
Date: May, 2002.
As
anyone who's been reading our Feedback pages recently knows,
SG-1 will be one man down when Stargate
returns for its sixth season. Michael
Shanks has quit his role
as Daniel Jackson after five years, and in an outspoken interview
he tells Diane McGinn
why he felt he had to go…
After five years as Stargate SG-1's
archaeologist Daniel Jackson, Michael Shanks left the show, to the
dismay of his many fans, and made little secret of his unhappiness
with his role in Season Five. Ironically, Starburst caught
up with him as he was promoting the DVD release of Stargate's
fifth season, so we had to ask the tactless question: what was it
about the fifth season which convinced him he didn't want to stick
around for another year?
It wasn't just what was going on in
Season Five. It was something which began in Season Four, and what
got me through then was the prospect of directing at the end of
the season [for the penultimate episode, Double Jeopardy].
That was kind of my central focus for that year." The actor pauses,
and backtracks a little to the start of the story.
"A bit of a changing of the guard
had happened on the production side of Stargate at the end
of Season Three," he explains, "and I saw early in Season Four what
was going to happen. They were trying to introduce this character
of Anise [the glamorous Tok'ra played by Vanessa Angel], and all
of a sudden this love relationship between Carter and O'Neill seemed
to blossom, and I just went to the writers of the show and went
'What are you doing, what's going on here? You're making it into
a soap opera!' I knew that with all this going on, my character
and Teal'c would be just left on the back seat, but they came back
to me and said 'It's just something we're experimenting with.'"
So here comes the $64,000 dollar question.
Is this about the series losing its focus, or about one actor grumbling
because he wasn't getting so much to do? After all, some would argue
that Daniel was neglected by the writers because his story had some
to an end. Originally, he was trying to rescue his wife Sha're from
the Goa'uld, but she was killed in Season Three. Did he have anything
else to do? Michael Shanks takes the point, but disagrees. "I think
you can have that problem of writing a character into a corner,
but at the same time you have the ability to bust him out of that
corner. After all, with the character of Carter they managed to
cross the 'mythical boundaries' with complete frivolity, saying
'We'll make her an astrophysicist, we'll make her a captain and
eventually a major in the US air force. We'll make her a kick arse
martial artist and an ace shot, and a field medic and an expert
in technologies - not just knowing the basic principles of science,
but understanding the technologies as well - and then she gets penetrated
by a Goa'uld so now she has their inherited abilities… It's like
'Wow, she should have her own series!'
"They seemed to do that pretty freely
with that character, so I didn't really see how it would be too
much of a stretch to find some justification for giving Daniel some
added aspects. It would only be a matter of putting thought to idea
and then pen to paper. But it just wasn't important enough to the
writers. That wasn't for lack of me speaking out, saying, 'Hey,
I'm not dong nothing, I'm not active in this script.' Sometimes
efforts were made, but more often than not they weren't and so after
a while I knew that no matter how much jumping up and down I did
it wasn't going to happen."
But there were still some good moments,
surely? "I try to think of highlights from the last couple of years,
and I just come up blank. I could list probably a dozen of them
from the first three seasons… but the last two… Absolute Power
was one, the one where Daniel got to take over the world. That was
fun to do, playing Daniel Jackson with a bit of a sarcastic sense
of humour… The Groundhog Day episode Window of Opportunity
was very fun, not necessarily just for me but as a talented group
of people working together. There's a lot of sense of humour behind
the scenes which the viewers don't usually get to see, and that
got to come through in Window of Opportunity… there are highlights,
and they're not all big Daniel episodes, particularly over the last
couple of years."
He adds a note of appreciation for
the co-stars who created that on-set fun. "I think so, for the most
part, with Don Davis, and Teryl and Mandy and Christopher Judge
and myself, we're all creative people and a good, grounded base
of individuals, who've been somewhat emotionally affected by what
has happened. Talking to them, they all relate to my standpoint.
They in a way they wish that they had the luxury to take the sort
of stance… but at the same time I respect their decision to stay
with the show.
"It would be certainly arrogant of
me to claim that the show was not a good show without myself at
the centre," Michael Shanks continues. "I didn't think that at all.
Some of the shows that I watched were very entertaining, and if
I was looking at it from the perspective of flicking around the
channels on Friday night, I'd think that was not a bad hour of television.
I mean sometimes I would watch The X-Files and think 'Wow,
great show, I really want to see if I can get on that show…' but
I was doing the same thing on some episodes of Stargate,
thinking 'I wish I could get on that show… wait a minute, I am on
that show!'"
He's referring to the more political
episodes about the implications for the US military of the Stargate
project, where his character Daniel Jackson tended to stay on the
sidelines. "That was really the moment of realisation that, regardless
of whether it's a quality television programme, I'm not really doing
much on it anymore, and that wasn't always my lot. If it had always
been from the start, then maybe I would have accepted that, but
the change that had happened, where I went from doing a fair bit
on the show to doing less and less… Well, I didn't think that was
deserved and I didn't think it was true to the original premise
of the series… and that wasn't something I was going to tolerate,
as an actor. I was told that it wasn't a conscious decision, but
the result was still the same. So knowing that that wasn't going
to change for the sixth season, I knew that I was going to get out
then."
But couldn't he have stuck around
for half the season, taking a leading role in episodes where Daniel's
skills were important, and heading off on leave when they weren't?
"I think they wanted the character there for the whole time or they
didn't want him at all. I mean, [producer] Brad Wright had gone
on record as saying he wanted Daniel to guest star in six episodes
of this series, but did anyone come forward to me to talk about
these six episodes?"
Of course, since we spoke to Michael
Shanks, he has made a sixth season guest appearance in the tenth
episode, Abyss, but at the time he saw little chance of making
a return appearance. "That was more a public relations exercise,
something to throw at the angry fan response that it was to actually
guarantee the fans that the character would be back."
"I don't think at this point they
are even thinking of that," he adds, warming to the theme. "It seems
strange to me that a company which is so interested in forming a
franchise, with a spin-off show and a film to come, could fail to
satisfy one of its main characters, and hold the door open for him
to re-appear. Is that good business sense? I don't think so. It's
not that I'm desperate to come back… but their response was, 'You
want to go? Oh, well there's the door, don't forget to close it
on your way out.' That doesn't seem very smart business sense to
me. I could understand if it was just the last year of the show,
end of discussion, but they're talking about a feature film and
a spin-off franchise after that, so to alienate their audience…
It shows their complete disrespect to the character of Daniel Jackson
and to me as an actor, it shows that they don't seem to think that
he was that important to the show. But that was something which
was already reflected in the writing, so there was nothing shocking
to me about that."
Something the character's fans did
find shocking was the way Daniel Jackson's departure from the series
was almost ignored by the powers-that-be. While the fans had known
Michael Shanks was leaving for months, the lack of official statements
could have left you thinking he'd be around for the sixth season.
"What a surprise!" laughs Michael Shanks. "It's called denial, it's
denying that the character was ever important enough to warrant
an announcement… I don't think the people at MGM who run the show
really think the Sam, Teal'c and Daniel characters are too important
to the show. They're just expendable assets, so that's the way they've
acted. They never really promoted us when we were on the show, so
why promote us when we're off it? It's kind of like ignoring that
we were there, and then ignoring that we're going…"
So how does he feel about Daniel's
actual departure, in the episode Meridian? "Well, I still
feel he got short-changed. They introduced another character, who
is essentially Daniel's replacement, in that same episode, which
is not doing either of us any favours." Shanks is referring to Corin
Nemec's character of Jonas Quinn, a similarly bookish scientist,
who eventually comes through by confirming that Daniel saved Jonas'
homeworld from the folly of its own dangerous experiments. "I mean
he's walking into a very emotionally involved situation for actors
and fans alike… and this is his grand entrance? You get this perception
of 'Can you go out and come back in an hour when we're all done
here?'"
So why does Shanks reckon the powers-that-be
decided to crowd Meridian with departures and arrivals? "Well,
Brad Wright's gone on record as saying the important thing was to
introduce a positive element in the midst of this tragedy, otherwise
the audience would get depressed by Daniel's demise. It's like…
when your cat dies, is the first thing you do the next day to run
out and get a new kitten? But it's again a reflection of the corporation's
attitudes towards the characters. 'Well, we'll just get another
guy who's six feet tall and of fair appearance to play this sort
of character.'
"So I think I was short-changed in
that episode, plus it's kind of a speed bump on the way to the cliffhanger,
in terms of it being the penultimate episode. So right after he's
dead, then we have our big cliffhanger episode, which is full of
action and big fights on the way to next season. I thought that
was kind of funny as well. Certainly I had a big spotlight shone
on my character, but the fact that it affects the overall shape
of the show, well, that's 'Ooops', and then we continue on… I thought
that a two-parter, which incorporated all the elements of it, might
have been a possibility. I'd have liked to have seen something more
like the departure of regular characters in some other series, so
it was less token. But then I've seen that on other shows too, so
maybe in a sense I should be grateful or what I got…"
But what about another aspect of Daniel's
'death'? Because he doesn't actually die… he's raised to a higher
level of existence by Mother Earth. "I think that was determined
by the producers' agenda," says Michael Shanks, "but it's a bit
of a wimping out of the emotional impact, by saying that he's not
dead. I thought it was more of a tactic than a plot device. I mean
its purpose at the end of the day is to make it very apparent that
the character is still out there in some form or another, but I
don't necessarily agree with the way it was done."
And it turns out that Daniel will
probably be coming back. But by that point, Corin Nemec will be
an established part of the team, if he can make his mark. We wondered
which task Shanks would have found more daunting: taking over another
actor's role as a concept makes the transition from the big screen
to television, as Shanks had to do at the start of the series, or
joining a long-established show as a new character. "I think the
second option would certainly be more daunting, at least for me,
because at least in the first, all the players are different for
the most part. We were all new producers, new directors, new actors,
we were all starting something new. It was based on the film, but
it was our new idea of what that is. We were all starting new together."
After all, it wasn't as if Shanks had to step straight into James
Spader's shows to play against the original Colonel O'Neill, Kurt
Russell. "Exactly, exactly. And I think the idea of stepping into
something for what you know is only going to be one season… Well,
I don't want to speak against the actor who's stepping into that,
because I know he's got a tough job ahead of him, and I don't blame
him. I blame the producers who put him in that position, where he
has to face that kind of adversity. But I'm sure he'll go in and
do the best he can."
So what's next for Michael Shanks,
aside from some movies and his sixth season guest appearance? Well,
there was almost a major role in the next Star Trek movie.
"Oh yes, that was just an audition and that didn't happen. It was
the young Patrick Stewart character, a kind of gene spliced version
of Patrick Stewart, which would have been an interesting acting
challenge. But because I haven't really watched a lot of the Next
Generation I didn't really have that Patrick Stewart…" he clicks
his fingers. "I didn't have that down right, and at the same time
I didn't really look enough like Patrick Stewart, so…" He shrugs.
Win some, lose some.
That seems to sum up his attitude
to Stargate SG-1, after five years of good times and bad.
"I wish I'd known how it would have evolved, and that's kind of
what fuels my ire a little bit, the fact that I saw it coming but
was told 'Don't worry about it'. But I didn't get what was promised,
and I wish I'd known to get out at that time… it's a learning experience."
Go
to the Starburst Website
Back
|